PhD Defence by Janneke Rutgers

On January 13, 2022 Janneke Rutgers successfully defended her PhD Thesis “from Panacea to Paradox: The internal dynamics of regional cooperation in Dutch demographically shrinking regions”. She was supervised by Prof. Gert-Jan Hospers and Dr Tamara Metze. As we know, places and regions are not ‘made’ by one single actor, but are co-produced by both civil society actors as well as governmental actors, and the success of this ‘placemaking’ process is very much dependent on how well civil society and government chime together. This was also the topic of a number of other PhD research projects in the framework of our human geography group, although each from another angle. Like in many of my other contributions to this blog site, I always tend to be rather critical if it is presupposed that one single actor or one single cause is responsible for the success or failure of ‘placemaking’. In most cases, these kinds of presuppositions are the result of an unjustified reductionism. In the real world, it is always a combination of different causal factors and circumstances and always the results of how the different actors cooperate.  To be successful in placemaking one always needs to take the full complexity of the situation into account, and one always needs to foster cooperation to be successful. The first is resembled in my own tendency to favour ‘practice theories’, while the latter relates to my preference for ‘inter-action’ instead of individual top-down actions and decision making. From this perspective, the PhD thesis of Janneke Rutgers immediately struck the right chord. Using Urban Regime Theory she empirically shows that what started as ambitious and very open civil society initiatives, gradually developed into more regulated and restricted governmental policies in which the original objectives lost focus, while the continuation of the regulatory regime became a target in itself. This is also the essence of the paradox of regional cooperation she describes with the slogan ‘cooperation well organised, urgency of shrinkage approach disrupted’ (in Dutch: ‘samenwerking goed geregeld, urgentie krimpaanpak ontregeld’). She nicely shows how important it is to keep the balance, and she makes extensive practical recommendations on how to do so. A great piece of research where we can learn from. (Click on the picture to the left to download her PhD thesis)

 

PhD Defence of Maja Ročak

We often speak of Placemaking in a very positive and future-oriented activity through which we create and build something new, but Placemaking under conditions of shrinkage is a totally other thing. Placemaking then can easily become the cutting down of existing structures. A rather depressing activity. Nevertheless, also under these conditions Placemaking is highly relevant. Placemaking refers to changing places, and certainly, under conditions of shrinkage, places do change, irrespective if we like it or not. Under these difficult conditions, the quality of our Placemaking and the use of all available resources and skills becomes very crucial. This is exactly where the PhD thesis of Maja Ročak, supervised by Prof. Gert-Jan Hospers from our Geography group and Dr. Nol Reverda from Zuyd  University of Applied Science, which she successfully defended on  January 10, 2020, comes in.

Maja Ročak investigated the use of Social Capital by the Civil Society in the context of Urban Shrinkage and how this affects the way they experience the shrinkage. So this clearly also refers to the social theoretic work of Bourdieu. While I was composing this entry, I just happened to come out of the course in which we teach our students the relevance of these social theoretic thinkers for our current research. So this PhD thesis also gives me the satisfaction that indeed, we teach what is needed. The PhD thesis of Maja Ročak not only elaborates on those issues but also recommends how one can better mobilise these civic resources in situations of shrinkage to also make the best out of these places. Placemaking under these difficult conditions instead of Placemaking in already successful places is the real art of Placemaking.